| dc.contributor.author | Atika | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-09T04:01:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-09T04:01:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-10-03 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/3145 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This research discusses the microstructure of Fraser Anning’s controversial statement on Christchurch shooting which happened on March, 15 2019. The objectives of this research are to investigate the microstructure used on the statement of Fraser Anning, the way microstructure realized in that statement, and the cause of microstructure realized in the statement. This study was qualitative descriptive design which is concern on Van Djik Critical Discourse Analysis. The researcher took a statement of Fraser Anning Controversial statement consist of eight sentence and twenty eight lines. From the research, the researcher found there were four types of microstructure used on Fraser Anning Controversial statement on Christchurch shooting. The microstructure realized from the language used by Fraser Anning that indicate as a discrimination toward Muslim. | en_US |
| dc.subject | critical discourse analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fraser Anning’s statement | en_US |
| dc.title | Critical Discourse Analysis on Queensland Senator Fraser Anning’s Controversial Statement of Christchurch Shooting | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |