Abstract:
The maritime boundary dispute between Kenya and Somalia is one example of the rise of
maritime disputes over natural resources. The dispute, which stems from different
interpretations of boundaries in the Indian Ocean, has attracted the attention of the entire
international community, especially on the African continent. In 2014, Somalia filed a
lawsuit against Kenya in the International Court of Justice regarding the delimitation of
maritime boundaries between the two coastal states. The International Court of Justice
examined the basis of Somalia's lawsuit in proposing the settlement of the dispute. This study
aims to determine the maritime zone boundary between Kenya and Somalia according to
UNCLOS 1982, to determine the role of the International Court of Justice in resolving the
dispute and to determine the legal impact of the International Court of Justice Decision
regarding the maritime dispute between Kenya and Somalia. The research method used is
normative law research with a statutory approach and a case approach. The results showed
that the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea divided the maritime zone
as inland waters, territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, and continental shelf. The
International Court of Justice played an important role in determining the maritime
boundary between Kenya and Somalia. The International Court of Justice's ruling has had
a significant impact on the two countries' deteriorating bilateral relations, increasingly
tense political relations, as well as impacting the security and socio-economic sectors in the
East African region.
