Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/3145
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAtika-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-09T04:01:04Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-09T04:01:04Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-03-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/3145-
dc.description.abstractThis research discusses the microstructure of Fraser Anning’s controversial statement on Christchurch shooting which happened on March, 15 2019. The objectives of this research are to investigate the microstructure used on the statement of Fraser Anning, the way microstructure realized in that statement, and the cause of microstructure realized in the statement. This study was qualitative descriptive design which is concern on Van Djik Critical Discourse Analysis. The researcher took a statement of Fraser Anning Controversial statement consist of eight sentence and twenty eight lines. From the research, the researcher found there were four types of microstructure used on Fraser Anning Controversial statement on Christchurch shooting. The microstructure realized from the language used by Fraser Anning that indicate as a discrimination toward Muslim.en_US
dc.subjectcritical discourse analysisen_US
dc.subjectFraser Anning’s statementen_US
dc.titleCritical Discourse Analysis on Queensland Senator Fraser Anning’s Controversial Statement of Christchurch Shootingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:English Language Education



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.